I successfully passed both the Challenge and Verification stages with Amadeux and was about to receive a funded account. Everything looked smooth—until they suddenly accused me of using an “ex-dividend arbitrage strategy,” which made no sense since I only traded the USTEC (NASDAQ index CFD)—not any dividend-paying stocks.After I pointed this out, they changed their accusation and claimed I used a “scalping” strategy. However, my shortest trade was 57 minutes, and many trades were held for hours or even days. That’s clearly not scalping.They refused to show any trade-level evidence or specify which trades violated which rules. Instead, they offered to restart the challenge from scratch—but at this point, I’ve lost trust. It feels like they can accuse you of anything to avoid moving forward once you pass.I’ve been in the trading industry for over 15 years, helping other traders succeed and pass prop firm challenges. I tested Amadeux to see if it could be a firm I’d recommend to my students—but sadly, it appears that it is not.With no transparency, shifting accusations, and vague rules, I cannot recommend Amadeux to any serious trader.Update: 2025.05.12I had further communications with Amadeux, and they were very professional in solving the problem. I appreciate their transparency, and I can definitely rate them 5 stars now.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
Get funded with top-tier regulated brokers, sharpen your strategies, and thrive with a firm fully committed to your success.
