Everything what's written in other reviews related to corrupted judges and how the case is treated when you come by yourself with no legal representatives is true.Don't even try to request for reconsideration because the corrupted judge (in my case judge Heath) will give you a very fluffy response without any consideration: "there was a dispute on day 1 about documents disclosed late. However, on the morning of day 2 the Claimant confirmed that she had no objection to the documents going in the bundle, and that she would be asking questions of the witnesses about them. There is nothing in this part of the application which would lead the Tribunal to vary or revoke it's decision. In respect of the unreliable statements, it appears that the Claimant is simply seeking to persuade the Tribunal to change its determination on the facts. We reached a decision on the basis of the evidence put before us. The Claimant is just asking us to take a different view". The judge Heath during the hearing questioned himself the genuinity of the document while challenging the respondent and it was admitted that it was never presented to anybody and it was not clear when that document was created. However, they made a judgement based on that document in their verdict clearly favouring the respondent. HIGHLY CORRUPTED BUNCH OF SERVANTS WHO DO NOT CARE ABOUT SINGLE INDIVIDUALS AND USING THE SITUATION AGAINST YOU IF YOU COME TO THE HEARING WITHOUT ANY LEGAL REPRESENTATION.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
