After waiting two years for a deeply unsatisfactory investigation report regarding two complaints, I reached out to the organization 18 months ago to confirm that both issues were being addressed. The investigator has shown bias and a lack of impartiality favoring my landlord, stating they cannot investigate the second complaint unless the landlord is given a chance to 'make things right,' leading to the closure of the case. This is perplexing, as the guidelines suggest that both parties should be engaged for a fair resolution. I've made it clear that due to my landlord's behavior, I refuse to agree to any proposals they offer and expect the organization to address the landlord's multiple failures to follow the stipulated guidelines. I've encountered numerous false statements from the case officer, conveyed through condescending emails from their management. Having gone through this process multiple times, it's evident that the organization is flawed and unfit for its purpose, requiring oversight from an independent authority. Their new approach seems to prioritize landlords' chances to 'make things right' over thorough investigations, ultimately undermining tenants' rights. It is unlikely that any real accountability will occur, and I believe the government should reinstate legal aid for housing cases to empower tenants against irresponsible landlords.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
We resolve disputes and support effective landlord-tenant dispute resolution by others. Our service is free to tenants, independent and impartial.