The same predatory model other "prop firms" use. Demo trades with vague rules wording saying they may or may not hedge against your virtual trades (lol). They imply in one rule that some trades are real while others are not. Fact is that they profit from traders losing challenges (90%+) and every cent a winning trader wins comes off of their bottom line. Think about that before spending thousands with the dream to scale multiple accounts with fake funds in the millions. They need you to fail long term. Here's a snippet of the rules: "For purposes of managing risk and minimizing transaction costs, we may offset or negate market risk and act as the direct counterparty to certain trades initiated in the Account. Such trades are executed at prices provided by arm’s length third parties. This framework is intended to ensure you receive real market execution on your trades, while simultaneously allowing us to manage risk dynamically by routing existing positions or future orders to third parties for execution as we deem appropriate." -ask yourself why they "may" trade as counterparty to manage non-existent "risk" on virtual trades. As support continuously stated, they just "may" trade as counterparty. As you can see form the language, it's anything but clear and can mean what you (or they) want it to mean. Just as their reply to my review shows, it's marketing language. They will not be able to give you a specific as to how they make any money other than from failed challenges. Payouts are their marketing costs, failed challenges their main revenue. That's the model.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
