I must say that my experience with the site has been wonderful. I completed two house sits and have a third and hopefully a fourth in the next two months. The criticism I am reading is quite unfair. A simple minded person can figure out that the site is merely a broker putting a home owner and sitter together to create an arms length transaction. It is not a site to vet for either side. YOU must do this. I find it easy to make a decision on engaging in a gig. I research the home on Redfin or Zillow, ask personal questions of the owner and get to work confirming if the risk is worth the gig. Certain aspects are just based on your gut. Are they educated, employed and are they open to your inquiries? If any side holds one back form confirming inquiries, buyer beware. Both sides should be just as concerned. The internet is an endless opportunity for all. Do your homework! I do not blame the site for dropping those that have bad experiences on both sides. It is not their problem and I can only imagine the legality on their part if they were to get in the middle of both parties. They need not do anything for any dispute. They are merely brokers and they get $20 a year from you to be such. Go elsewhere if you want more and let go of the bad reviews.Fondly,Mr. Delight
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
Global house sitting matching service bringing home owners and house sitters together online. Home owners join for free. House sitter members pay the lowest annual fee on the web. Happy house sitting!
