Count the titles containing a question mark, the words "may/might", "can/could/should/would" or anything else defining the article as guesswork, add Netflix and book reviews and you'll realize New Scientist has hardly anything scientific to publish anymore. Historical scientific data is forever hidden behind a subscription fee, where NS declares itself owner instead of the scientists who did the research. This revenue model is sick and needs to be replaced urgently.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
Science news and science articles from New Scientist