5 years ago when I joined ET as a reader, "objective journalists that left me to decide my views" rather that tell me how to think.But that was 5 years ago.Since that time, AP Press articles and contributions have become normal print for readers. As many already know, even before Trump, AP tells people how think and react. After the senseless murder of Charlie Kirk, ET ran a article "having APPress contribution" where Gavin Newsom expressed political anger of the murder of Charlie Kirk. May comment to the article, " Gavin Newsom, you have nothing to say. You earned that bullet" - short version of what I said.ET pulled my comment for encouraging trouble. Ironically the article suggested that Charlie Kirk asked for his own demise, as expressed by AP, Charlie Kirk's rhetoric hot him killed. In the following exchanges with ET staff, the Editors had no problem with AP expressing the explanation for the killing of Kirk.ET refused apology for it's hypocrisy and to restore my status. My subscription normally on auto renewal was canceled and I ended ET.They are today far better media sources then to be trapped by hypocrisy. Vern Berry
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
The Epoch Times is America’s fastest-growing independent news media. Founded in 2000, our mission is to bring you a truthful view of the world free from the influence of any government, corporation, or political party. We aim to tell you what we see, not how to think; we strive to deliver you a factual picture of reality that lets you form your own opinions.