gopancham.com

4.2
4.2 Based on 20 reviews

We're the #1 growth partner for fitness-based businesses. We're here to help you free up your time AND increase your bottom line....

Unclaimed Profile
Business profile not claimed
This business hasn’t yet claimed their profile on our platform and may be unaware it's listed. As a result, their rating might not fully reflect their customer service or responsiveness.
Functional Fit
Performance Review: Pancham Agency (6-Month Period) This review evaluates the performance and ROI of

Performance Review: Pancham Agency (6-Month Period)
This review evaluates the performance and ROI of Pancham based on a total expenditure of $19,000 ($9,000 agency fees + $10,000 Meta ad spend) over a six-month engagement.
Financial Summary & ROI
* Total Investment: $19,000
* Total Leads: 400+
* Total Trial Conversions: 12
* Total Membership Conversions: 3 ($119/ea)
* Direct Revenue: ~$357 (Memberships) + ~$126 (Trials) = $483
* Net Loss: -$18,517
* Return on Ad Spend (ROAS): 0.02x
Monthly Performance Breakdown
| Month | Ad Spend | Leads | Trials | Memberships | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| August | $2,500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Zero output during launch. |
| Sept. | $4,000 | 100 | 0 | 0 | High CPL; zero conversion. |
| Oct. | $3,500 | 60 | 2 | 0 | Conversion rate < 1%. |
| Nov. | $3,500 | 65 | 6 | 2 | Peak performance month (still ROI negative). |
| Dec. | $3,500 | 55 | 4 | 0 | Engagement dropped. |
| Jan. | $1,700 | - | 0 | 1 | intentional Reduced ad spend due to inefficiency. |
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
* Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC): The cost to acquire a single $119 membership was $6,333.33.
* Lead Quality: Despite generating over 400 leads, the lead-to-trial conversion rate sat at 3%, with a lead-to-membership conversion rate of 0.75%.
* Operational Overhead: High internal labor was required for follow-ups, further increasing the effective cost of the campaign.
Critical Deficiencies
* Low Efficiency: The funnel failed to achieve a sustainable "Cost Per Acquisition" (CPA). The expenditure significantly outweighed the front-end revenue and long-term value.
* Service Quality: Call service performance was reported as suboptimal, failing to convert the high volume of leads into tangible trials or memberships.
* Discrepancy in Delivery: There is a significant gap between the initial agency promises and the recorded 6-month data.
Final Verdict
Not Recommended. The engagement resulted in near-total loss of capital ($18.5k+ deficit) and significant time loss. The model proved unsustainable for this business type due to low lead quality and high agency overhead.

1
Date of experience: Feb 12, 2026

Is this your business?

Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.

Business Details

We use cookies to personalize your experience. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our use of cookies

More