Mathew McConville is not someone who can be trusted. He failed to monitor our claim properly and allowed our defendant to dissolve. He withheld our case file and destroyed our claim with his negligence. We dont think he actually worked our case even though he was the fee earner, we think someone less qualified did and this is why he manufactured information and tampered with documents to hide the negligence when the legal ombudsman investigated him.Its also very interesting that some of the positive reviews on here can be cross checked to other online resources and the names seem to be associated with him. Could it be he has asked for people to make positive reviews to inflate his ego ? you decide.Ian Kyle is another one who cannot be trusted, he wrote a review of our case which was later proven to be fabricated. These two are both under investigation by the SRA and the ICO has taken an interest in the tampered documents and other general GDPR non compliance. Interesting they claim to be GDPR experts when they themselves have already been found not to have complied with the GDPR and are again under investigation.Just today we've heard again from the legal ombudsman about their negligence and we expect to hear from the SRA and the ICO shortly.This company should be avoided. There are plenty of others out there, dont run the risk of using this company and hoping it will work out.** Update 27/05/2025 Irvings were invited to put matters right, but didn't even answer the request.They were found not to have complied with the GDPR and instructed to comply within 14 days, but it took them more than three months and several chases and even then still withheld data triggering another report to the ICO.They were contacted by the SRA following a report of non-compliance and instructed to comply.The ombudsman found them guilty of several service failings. The investigation even discovered documents that had been retrospectively created and other false documents submitted to try and change the facts.The directors of the company have been reported to companies house along with evidence showing their "unfit to be directors".They might protest, but the fact is their failure to manage our claim and then their invented information to conceal their behavior meant our claim could not be pursued. There have even been talks with the police about allegations of crimes against the computer misuse act. All this can be substantiated with independent documents, not created by Irvings or tampered with. They don't like honest reviews, they refute anything that doesn't agree with their point of view.If this honest review can deter at least one person from using this awful company then that will be a good thing. Its time to hit them in their pocket as that is the only thing they place any importance on.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
