I would like to analyze your response point by point: Your comment lacks verifiable information. You didn't refute my claims regarding the service's role as a counterparty or market maker, simply stating they 'cannot be verified.' Without an account number, you avoid addressing the structural issue. My comment focuses on the business model, not an individual case. The statement about the service being fully regulated doesn't guarantee neutrality or absence of market making. Regulation is often used as a marketing tool rather than proof of integrity. Your vague assertions about execution and pricing leave many questions unanswered. I seek clarification on whether the service may act as a counterparty to client trades, whether client orders are internalized, and if prices are synthetic quotes rather than centralized exchange prices. These inquiries pertain to the business model, not specific trades. Transparency on execution models is vital for retail traders to comprehend potential conflicts of interest.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
