I am writing to provide formal service-user feedback to the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman. This correspondence is separate from, and not intended to form part of, any live complaint or decision review.I am an experienced adult who has spent several years navigating NHS and public-sector complaints processes in Scotland, including escalation to the SPSO. I am writing because the way the SPSO currently operates has a profound and damaging effect on people who approach it as a last safeguard.By the time most individuals reach the SPSO, they are already exhausted. They have typically experienced prolonged harm, repeated deflection, and procedural dead-ends elsewhere. Many approach the SPSO believing it to be an independent body that will finally examine the substance of what has gone wrong.What they often encounter instead is a process that focuses narrowly on whether an organisation followed its own procedures, rather than whether those procedures were applied accurately, safely, or reasonably in the real world. Where a public body asserts that its position is “reasonable,” that assertion can appear to be accepted even when complainants provide detailed, evidence-based accounts of ongoing harm, factual inaccuracies, or unresolved risk.The outcome is not simply disappointment. It is a sense of being erased.When serious concerns are reduced to procedural compliance, complainants are left feeling disbelieved, diminished, and blamed for persisting. Many describe the experience as retraumatising — not because they failed to obtain a particular outcome, but because their lived reality is reframed as inconsequential once it no longer fits within SPSO’s narrow lens of review.This has real consequences. People leave the SPSO process more distressed than when they entered it, having been told — implicitly or explicitly — that documented harm, risk, or systemic failure does not warrant further scrutiny because it sits outside procedural boundaries. For individuals already at breaking point, this can be devastating.Oversight bodies do not only resolve complaints; they shape public confidence. When the final stage of redress is experienced as procedural closure without substantive engagement, it risks functioning as a firewall rather than a safeguard.I am not writing this out of anger, nor to challenge a specific decision. I am writing because the human impact of SPSO’s operating model is not incidental — it is foreseeable, repeatable, and being felt by many people who come to you already vulnerable.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) is the final stage for complaints about councils, the National Health Service, housing associations, colleges and universities, prisons, most water providers, the Scottish Government and its agencies and departments and most Scottish authorities.