An extremely poor source of news (misnomer - most of the content is mendacious), shoddily put together. I am incredulous that a publication of this size doesn't have an editor. I have noticed a significant amount of typos, grammatical errors, bad syntax, wrongly used phrases (to fall on one's own sword means to self inflict), unnecessary repetition of words - where alternatives would sound better (at one point, the word 'indeed' was coming up at least three times in every article and even as high as seven) and headlines featuring the same overly dramatic words - often in caps - for nearly all of their articles.I don't understand how a transfer that doesn't happen was once 'thundering' towards completion? Why are managers hoping for a transfer always 'in dreamland'? There must be a decent alternative phrase meaning happy - although, mostly, they're in dreamland over something that doesn't come to fruition!This goes along with contradicting articles posted on the same day and misleading headlines that read as fact for articles that actually feature nothing but the opinion of a low ranked pundit.I feel that if these things were to be amended before publication, they may be able to appeal to and retain a readership who do not come to them for content due to these unfortunate issues. I know their current target audience is not the UK or even Europe; but would they not like to appeal to a demographic whose mother tongue is English or most of who are at least fluent in English? I'm sure this would please their advertisers and draw in new ones - that way they wouldn't still be featuring Christmas related adverts in May! Is the choice of not having an editor due to the demographic of their target audience? That would be a shame because their audience could be far broader.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
