Review Time
Unreliable fictional none factual clickbait just like the rest what they don't know they make up they just sensationalise fiction it is all just clickbait traffic what they do not know they make up with so called journalists like Ben Jacob's that just talk absolute trash same with the rest of the nobody's on it they just wake up and think what can we make up today its like the Viz for the comedy gold it makes up
Unreliable fictional none factual clickbait just like the rest what they don't know they make up they just sensationalise fiction it is all just clickbait traffic what they do not know they make up with so called journalists like Ben Jacob's that just talk absolute trash same with the rest of the nobody's on it they just wake up and think what can we make up today its like the Viz for the comedy gold it makes up
Absolutely garbage a useless biased website that the so called journalists just trash talks specific clubs ( this utter nonsense trash talk is definitely a London biased journalism teams, like arsenal, Chelsea and spurs so pathetic) this type of behaviour and journalism should be banned permanently and should not be allowed to be published!
Giving away my age but I've been using TEAMtalk since it provided club news via premium rate phone lines in the early 1990s, and then became a reader of their website in the late '90s. There's so much competition now and I follow Arsenal bloggers, TikTokkers and The Athletic but I'm sentimental so I still keep TEAMtalk bookmarked and visit regularly.
I've been a reader of TEAMtalk for decades and whilst the quality of coverage has fluctuated in that time, I have noticed a lot of improvement over the last few transfer windows in particular.They have added genuine transfer correspondents to their site and their accuracy has improved as a result.
An extremely poor source of news (misnomer - most of the content is mendacious), shoddily put together. I am incredulous that a publication of this size doesn't have an editor. I have noticed a significant amount of typos, grammatical errors, bad syntax, wrongly used phrases (to fall on one's own sword means to self inflict), unnecessary repetition of words - where alternatives would sound better (at one point, the word 'indeed' was coming up at least three times in every article and even as high as seven) and headlines featuring the same overly dramatic words - often in caps - for nearly all of their articles.I don't understand how a transfer that doesn't happen was once 'thundering' towards completion? Why are managers hoping for a transfer always 'in dreamland'? There must be a decent alternative phrase meaning happy - although, mostly, they're in dreamland over something that doesn't come to fruition!This goes along with contradicting articles posted on the same day and misleading headlines that read as fact for articles that actually feature nothing but the opinion of a low ranked pundit.I feel that if these things were to be amended before publication, they may be able to appeal to and retain a readership who do not come to them for content due to these unfortunate issues. I know their current target audience is not the UK or even Europe; but would they not like to appeal to a demographic whose mother tongue is English or most of who are at least fluent in English? I'm sure this would please their advertisers and draw in new ones - that way they wouldn't still be featuring Christmas related adverts in May! Is the choice of not having an editor due to the demographic of their target audience? That would be a shame because their audience could be far broader.
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
universalbookspublisher.com
aboxofstories.com
writers-online.co.uk
aistudioheadshot.com
tagmango.com
distromotion.com
oxfordbookpublishersllc.com
musysic.com
namepros.com
streamingmafia.com
