en.wikipedia.org

3.3
3.3 Based on 57 reviews

...

Unclaimed Profile
Business profile not claimed
This business hasn’t yet claimed their profile on our platform and may be unaware it's listed. As a result, their rating might not fully reflect their customer service or responsiveness.

Average Rating

3.3

/
5

57 Reviews

5 Star
52%
4 Star
2%
3 Star
3%
2 Star
7%
1 Star
37%

All Reviews

Filter Reviews

Review Time

Daniel
I often use Wikipedia to quickly look up information or get general background on topics. Articles a

I often use Wikipedia to quickly look up information or get general background on topics. Articles are usually well-structured and easy to navigate. Sometimes information can be outdated or incomplete, especially on niche subjects, but overall it's a useful and accessible resource.

4
Date of experience: Feb 24, 2026
Des C.
A Longtime Editor's Perspective on Wikipedia

Having edited on a collaborative platform for over two decades, I have come to value its processes and the dedication of countless volunteers who strive to keep it both relevant and useful. My experience as both an editor and a user has provided me with significant insights. However, I must highlight certain drawbacks, such as the cumbersome editorial process, inherent biases among editors, and the potential for unpleasant interactions when contributing content. These factors have constrained my ability to contribute effectively. I believe this is a key reason why the platform struggles with recruiting and retaining volunteer editors. A small group of contributors tends to dominate article creation, resulting in varying quality, and there is insufficient oversight to maintain high editorial standards. The platform risks becoming less relevant, especially with the rise of AI technologies. Engaging with an AI model for information is often a more satisfying experience than navigating the platform. That said, my journey of editing articles on subjects I’m passionate about has been enriching. I hope the platform can find ways to incorporate AI and enhance the experience for both contributors and users.

3
Date of experience: Dec 07, 2025
Jess Scott
Extremely disappointing experience on this platform.

I had an extremely disappointing experience on this platform. I was banned from editing due to allegedly making "unsourced" edits, which is untrue because I actually provided sources. The moderators were dismissive and didn't take the time to verify the validity of my links, simply rejecting them due to improper submission, despite having shown them the links in my messages. Their communication was also quite rude and condescending, indicating a lack of respect for their user base. I strongly recommend avoiding contributions to this platform. It's a very unappreciative experience.

1
Date of experience: Dec 03, 2025
BeiKeR63
A platform plagued by untrustworthy moderators.

My experience on this platform was extremely disappointing. I was banned from making edits due to alleged "unsourced" contributions, which is untrue as I provided valid sources. The moderators were dismissive and did not check the links I offered, simply rejecting them because of formatting issues, despite my efforts to show them. Their language was rude and condescending, reflecting a clear disdain for users. I strongly advise against contributing to this platform; it feels like a thankless endeavor.

1
Date of experience: Dec 03, 2025
Ralphie Carter
A biased information source.

This platform has turned into a biased information source, which is disappointing given its reputation among many users and media outlets. It is filled with obvious inaccuracies and lacks the nuance or opportunity for discussion.

1
Date of experience: Nov 05, 2025
Great experience!

I really enjoy editing on this platform.

5
Date of experience: Sep 08, 2025
Merle Sanders
A vital resource for knowledge.

This platform offers free and accessible information to anyone online. It is the largest encyclopedia ever created, built by a global community of volunteers, showcasing collective intelligence. Its availability in over 300 languages helps eliminate information barriers. Continuously updated, it reflects real-time changes and serves as an excellent starting point for research on nearly any topic. The commitment to neutrality fosters balanced understanding. As a non-profit, it remains free of advertising influence, empowering individuals by democratizing access to knowledge worldwide. Ultimately, it stands as a monumental testament to human collaboration and curiosity.

5
Date of experience: Aug 06, 2025
Sidney
Severely biased information.

As a PhD candidate in a specific field, I found the information on this platform regarding my topics to be entirely inaccurate, dismissing them as pseudoscience. Despite providing numerous peer-reviewed studies, the response I received was dismissive and showed a lack of understanding. It was clear that the reviewers did not engage with the research. I would advise against relying on this platform after such an experience.

1
Date of experience: Jul 02, 2025
Jordie Wilson
Frustrating experience.

I found my experience here to be extremely frustrating. After attempting to correct misinformation, my account was banned, and I am now unable to delete my account or change my username to something less identifiable. This raises concerns regarding privacy regulations.

1
Date of experience: Jun 09, 2025
Mercurio33292
Unreliable historical information.

The historical facts presented on this platform can no longer be trusted.

1
Date of experience: May 25, 2025

We use cookies to personalize your experience. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our use of cookies

More