tempolabs.ai

1.3
1.3 Based on 7 reviews

...

Unclaimed Profile
Business profile not claimed
This business hasn’t yet claimed their profile on our platform and may be unaware it's listed. As a result, their rating might not fully reflect their customer service or responsiveness.

Average Rating

1.3

/
5

7 Reviews

5 Star
11%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
11%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
78%

All Reviews

Filter Reviews

Review Time

Elvis
Tempolab works well compared to many other vibe-coding tools, mainly because of its design tool inte

Tempolab works well compared to many other vibe-coding tools, mainly because of its design tool integration. When used properly, it makes it easier to build clean, well-designed products . I’ve used Tempo to create over three projects ideas , and it has worked reliably for those projects.

5
Date of experience: Feb 17, 2026
Niall Butler
A Cautionary Tale About This Platform

This platform is not what it seems — it’s more of a trap. It fails to reliably export, cannot securely import, struggles with authentication management, and its AI lacks knowledge of its own system. I wasted days, lost credits, and ultimately had my database erased due to the system's failure to comprehend its own architecture. This was not just a single issue; it was a series of failures. The Full Timeline (This Matters)
I Started Here I initiated my project with this platform, focusing on backend logic, integration, and core data model without a frontend. Then, I required a proper UI. The Platform Failed to Offer a Clear Frontend Solution To create a suitable frontend, I was directed to move my project elsewhere. That’s when the first issues emerged: The platform does not provide a straightforward export The only method was to “go through GitHub” Documentation was inconsistent with reality What I received on GitHub was incomplete I didn’t get a full application; I received only part of the code. I Had to Rebuild the Application Elsewhere Due to the broken export: I manually reconstructed the frontend
Reconfigured connections
Rebuilt user flows
Everything was operational At this point: Data was intact
Authentication functioned
The application was running The Platform’s Own AI Advised Me to Stay Away Here’s the alarming part for anyone considering this service: The AI explicitly suggested I revert back because “that’s where all your stuff is.” This indicates that: The platform cannot fully manage its own projects
Even its AI acknowledges that migration is risky I Attempted to Return Regardless
Against my better judgment, I tried again. The same issues persisted: GitHub import only retrieved part of the project
Connections failed silently
Environment variables were unclear and undocumented
The UI accepted invalid keys without any warnings
It took hours to reconnect the backend. I Just Wanted One Simple Feature: Basic Login for Testing This is crucial: I did NOT want security.
I did NOT want production-level authentication.
I merely wanted to log in users for testing. However, the platform: Would not permit authentication to be disabled
Required functions I had not created
Enforced permissions that were never clarified
Would not allow bypassing authentication for local testing
This is a fundamental requirement. The platform failed to meet it. The AI Subsequently Wrecked My Database This is where it shifted from “poor tools” to dangerous territory. Because data wasn’t displaying (due to settings): The AI erroneously claimed the tables “did not exist” Without confirmation, it deleted and recreated them Hundreds of real entities were overwritten Sample data was inserted instead Later, the AI acknowledged: “I made a catastrophic mistake.” That’s unacceptable.
AI should never perform destructive actions by default. The AI Is Not Familiar with the Platform’s Product This is the fundamental flaw. The AI: Confused authentication modes
Misinterpreted settings behavior
Suggested invalid variables
Invented non-existent functions
Recommended switching services instead of fixing issues
Executed destructive migrations rather than diagnosing visibility problems
You cannot promote AI-assisted development if the AI does not understand: Your authentication model
Your deployment process
Your data safety boundaries Why This Is Unacceptable The platform fails at: Safe exports
Safe imports
State continuity
Authentication flexibility
Development/testing workflows
AI oversight
Data protection And worst of all: It fails silently until it jeopardizes your work. Final Verdict This platform is not ready for production.
It’s not even safe for prototypes. If you: Value your data
Need to switch between tools
Expect AI to assist rather than hinder
Or just want to log in users without struggle Avoid this platform. This was not user error.
This was a service that does not grasp its own limitations. I’m sharing this so others don’t lose days — or their data — as I did.

1
Date of experience: Dec 18, 2025
Harris Baker
Tempo: A Platform to Avoid

Tempo is not a reliable platform; it's a trap. It struggles with exports, imports, and authentication, and its AI lacks understanding of the product. I wasted days, lost credits, and ultimately had my database erased due to its failures. This wasn’t just one issue but a series of failures. I started my project with backend logic and integration but needed a proper UI. Tempo couldn't provide a clean frontend path and forced me to move to another service, where I faced export issues and incomplete documentation. I ended up rebuilding my app there. Tempo's AI even advised me to stay away from it, acknowledging that migration is unsafe. When I tried to return, the same problems persisted, including failed connections and ambiguous documentation. I just wanted basic login functionality for testing, but Tempo's restrictions made that impossible. The situation escalated when the AI mistakenly deleted my database, leading to catastrophic errors. The AI is poorly trained on its own product, making it unreliable. Overall, Tempo fails at crucial aspects like safe exports, imports, and data protection. Do not use Tempo if you value your data and need a reliable platform.

1
Date of experience: Dec 17, 2025
Sherry Hughes
Terrible Customer Service

The customer service is dreadful. I had an account that I never used, and when I reached out to cancel my subscription, they deleted my account but kept the payment for the period and denied my refund request.

1
Date of experience: Oct 23, 2025
Drake
Refund Issues

I was refunded to an old bank account I no longer use and they refuse to send the money again through a valid method. Their response time to emails is so slow that it's not worth pursuing further.

1
Date of experience: Sep 16, 2025
Maude Barnes
Unsatisfactory Refund Policy

The refund policy and customer service leave much to be desired.

1
Date of experience: Jul 09, 2025
Cameron Lewis
Lack of Support

I emailed support requesting a compliant corporate invoice, but their payment portal lacks essential fields. Despite multiple attempts to reach out via chat, most went unanswered, and the few responses I got were empty promises. My invoice remains incorrect, and all follow-up questions have been ignored. It's disappointing to feel like a bother rather than a valued customer. If you need proper invoicing, look elsewhere.

1
Date of experience: May 04, 2025
Sky_Craft1716
Enjoyable Experience, but Limited

I enjoy working with the service, but the limit of 15 prompts per day is frustratingly restrictive. Many prompts are automatically generated to fix bugs, leaving fewer for my own tasks. I wish they would differentiate between user-initiated and AI-generated prompts.

3
Date of experience: Feb 28, 2025
Heather Parker
Annoying Spam Practices

This company engages in annoying spam practices, sending unsolicited emails which is not a good business approach and violates regulations. Many spamming companies are often untrustworthy. I advise against doing business with them.

1
Date of experience: Jan 21, 2025

We use cookies to personalize your experience. By continuing to visit this website you agree to our use of cookies

More