Review Time
Dear Development Team,
I would like to provide feedback regarding the armor modeling of the M1A2 Abrams (SEP V2) in War Thunder.
While I greatly appreciate the realism and attention to detail in the game, I am concerned that the current armor values of the Abrams appear to be significantly lower than expected. For example, the turret cheeks are modeled at approximately 50 mm, whereas publicly available sources suggest that the effective protection in reality is well over 1000 mm (depending on the type of threat).
Similarly, the turret ring is shown as 50 mm in-game, while estimates suggest it should be closer to 250 mm. The lower front plate, sides, and rear sections also seem to be underrepresented compared to available data. Overall, the armor values appear to be several times weaker than what is generally reported for the real vehicle.
As a long-time player and a particular fan of the Abrams, I would greatly appreciate it if the armor modeling could be reviewed for accuracy. Thank you for your continued work on improving the game and maintaining its high standards of realism.
Kind regards,
This is a really good game but the match making is the worst iv ever seen in any game ever made. You literally put world War 2 planes in the same match making with 2026 f16s. Players steal all the kills and don't let new players get any points to get better vehicles purposely .this is 1000% a pay to win game and the creators intentionally make the game unenjoyable
I click a returning player link that I see on youtube.The link does nothing.I install the game to see if I can enter the code or link into the menu.No luck.I contact support who after 18 days of waiting tell me that I logged in a couple of minutes before the link was claimed and that there is nothing that can be done to credit any returning bonus to me. (Only after coercing this information out of them after they attempted to give me one sentence answers that did not help the support process whatsoever)Game is fine but the support made me feel like I was inconveniencing them for having a problem that could be fixed with a 5 minute grace period between a login and their inactivity timer.And support ticket wait times of 2 days, my reply, 2 days, my reply, 6 days, my reply, 3 days, my reply, should be a concern to any publisher serious about their community.
Used to be fun, but recent updates releasing blatantly overpowered vehicles and weapons for one nation while leaving others with bugs and none functioning counters is blatant bias. Forum posts are deleted and all conversation about vehicles is stifled on the forums. Played since 2012 this is the worst i've ever seen it...Play other games
This game is all about playing russia, in the new update the Su 30 sm2 (14.3) and the bmpt (10.7) completely ruined top tier. In my Eurofighter T2 with weak and not properly implemented missiles (aim-120c5) and a weak mechanical radar I have to against a team full of su 30 that are faster than the sm, have great armament the R-77-1 and an amazing radar, meanwhile other countries have worst offensive and defensive capabilities. For ground rb the bmpt ruined top tier, russian already had the best line of vehicles at 10.3/10.7 but now its simply brutal, russian mbt didnt always explode when hit on ammo and saved by magic era, now the bmpt double or even tripled that and if shows just the turret it can be killed. Overall a not well balanced game, I suggest that that the community works against gaijin to make them develop the game in a good way
Claim your business profile now and gain access to all features and respond to customer reviews.
- Varied PvP-experiences set in full-scale combat missions - Multiple settings options allow advanced virtual pilots and beginners to enjoy playing the game together - Rich PvE content: dynamic campaigns, solo missions, mission editor, and much more...
mrpunter1.com
magnetchess.shop
clubscasino.com
herotime1.com
onlinegenericos.to
surfhosting.co
overstockart.com
wunderdog.com
emp-shop.pl
gtomega.co.uk